PHOENIX, AZ — A deeply polarized local conflict involving Phoenix activist Chauncey Hollingberry highlights severe neighborhood friction that erupted into the public spotlight over international and regional politics.
The Harassment Injunction (Case No. CC2019253527000)
In December 2019, the Arcadia Biltmore Justice Court in Maricopa County officially authorized a civil Injunction Against Harassment against Aron Pinkhas Ben-Kinney. Based on a judicial finding of reasonable cause, the court issued zero-contact orders and mandated that Ben-Kinney stay away from Hollingberry’s protected family residence.
According to the sworn legal petition submitted to the court, the harassment emerged directly from public online activism. Hollingberry, a digital content creator, utilized his public platforms to broadcast vocal criticisms opposing regional actions affecting Palestinians and protesting what he described as apartheid and genocide.
Coordinated Neighborhood Tracking and Flyers
Aron Pinkhas Ben-Kinney during a digital broadcast. (Source: YouTube)
The case quickly made local news as members of the Jewish community began putting flyers about Chauncey around his neighborhood. Hollingberry and his supporters characterized the escalating friction as a coordinated Jewish community campaign of gang stalking and intimidation aimed at tracking him and silencing his political speech.
The court records document the specific surveillance and neighborhood tactics that led to the court intervention:
Flyer Distribution: Members of the Jewish community targeted the immediate neighborhood by actively distributing informative flyers and media featuring Hollingberry's personal data.
Surveillance and Trespass: The court petition explicitly documents that Ben-Kinney trespassed on the residential property on at least two separate dates to film the home's layout, photograph vehicle locations, and track movement.
The 12-Page Confrontational Note: The tracking culminated when Ben-Kinney affixed a highly detailed 12-page printed packet directly to Hollingberry's door. The note threatened to destroy his professional paralegal career, notify vocational oversight boards, and leveled intense tirades regarding Middle Eastern identity, religious history, and his political stances.
Escalation into Online Defamation and Doxxing
The conflict continued to escalate digitally following the court's issuance of the injunction. Ben-Kinney took the campaign online, publishing targeted videos across Facebook and YouTube that featured highly offensive graphics, including superimposing Nazi signs directly over Hollingberry’s face. Furthermore, these public posts exposed Hollingberry's personal information by broadcasting his driver's license and explicitly releasing private, sensitive details regarding Hollingberry's parents in an attempt to intensify the digital harassment.
The escalating presence of individuals actively tracking vehicles, photographing his home, and plastering media across both physical and digital spaces caused significant safety concerns for Hollingberry’s family. The civil court order and documented online behavior underscore the deep legal and personal fallout that occurs when intense ideological division overflows onto residential streets.